This is one profile in a set on cleared government contractors and the different ways the people who build them turn engineering work into real wealth. Most of the set is about selling. A founder builds a book of business, hands it to a larger buyer or a private equity sponsor, and rolls the proceeds into the next thing. The pattern is laid out in Built to Be Bought. A few of these companies run the other way, and Torch Technologies runs the other way harder than any of them. It is owned entirely by its employees, like PeopleTec down the road in Huntsville. Then it did something PeopleTec has not. Its employee-owners voted to make the arrangement permanent, so that no future board and no buyer could quietly undo it.
The company two engineers built
Torch started on October 2, 2002, in Huntsville, Alabama, the town that runs the Army's missile and space enterprise, as the company marked at its twentieth anniversary. Its founders were two veteran defense engineers, Bill Roark and Don Holder. Roark had been a senior vice president at another Huntsville contractor, and Holder had spent decades running large research-and-development programs, according to Torch's leadership page.
The reason they built the company the way they did is on the record. They had watched a previous employer get acquired, and the sale left promises the company had made to its own people impossible to keep, an experience Forbes traced as the origin of Torch's ownership model. They set out to build a firm where the people who did the work would own it, so that no outside sale could ever break that kind of promise again. Everything about how Torch is structured today follows from that decision.
Owned by a trust, not a person
The structure is worth reading closely, because it is a layer deeper than most employee-owned companies. Torch is not itself the employee-owned entity. It is a wholly owned subsidiary of a holding company called Starfish Holdings, and Starfish is an S-corporation owned 100 percent by an employee stock ownership plan and trust, as the parent describes on its own site. Starfish also owns a real-estate arm and a simulation-training venture, and the entire structure exists, in its own words, to grow the retirement accounts of the employee-owners underneath it.
The plan began in 2004, and by the end of 2011 it owned the company outright, reaching 100 percent employee ownership. The mechanics of how it got there tell the same story as the founding. When one of the founders stepped back from the business, the company bought his founder shares and moved them into the plan rather than selling them outside, so that even a founder's stake cashed out into the workforce instead of to a buyer. It is the same lesson as the rest of this series, that the money is in owning the asset, arranged so that the owners are the several hundred people who show up to work.
The vote to make it permanent
Here is the move that sets Torch apart even from the other employee-owned firms in this series. On October 2, 2023, the company's twenty-first anniversary, its roughly 1,200 employee-owners voted to convert Torch into a Delaware public benefit corporation. The margin was almost 90 percent of both the shares and the people, according to the company's announcement, well above the simple majority Delaware law required, and the change made Torch one of the first defense contractors in the country to take that step.
The distinction matters. An employee stock ownership plan is a way of holding the shares, but it is still a policy that a future board or chief executive could unwind, and a sufficiently large offer could always test everyone's resolve. A public benefit corporation writes the mission into the company's charter. It legally expands the duties of the board, requiring it to weigh the interests of employee-owners, customers, and communities, not just the share price, on any decision including a sale. The employees did not just own the company. They voted to bolt the door behind themselves. Bill Roark, testifying before a Senate committee in 2025 in support of employee-ownership legislation, put the philosophy plainly, saying the company's success comes from a model that "gives every employee a stake in the outcome and treats them as owners," as the Huntsville Business Journal reported.
The scale employee ownership did not cap
The easy assumption about broad ownership is that it caps ambition, that a company owned by everyone competes like no one. Torch is the counter-evidence. Its work is missile defense, modeling and simulation, systems engineering, test and evaluation, and cyber, largely for the Army and the Missile Defense Agency, and it holds prime seats on the big multiple-award vehicles those customers buy through, including the Army's RS3. The scale it reached while fully employee-owned is not modest. In a single week of May 2021 it won nearly 2.9 billion dollars in aviation and missile task orders, and in January 2026 it landed a 195 million dollar Army research-and-development contract.
By 2025 its annual revenue had passed 800 million dollars, the figure Roark cited in his Senate testimony, and it ranks on Washington Technology's list of the top government contractors, placing 57th on the 2024 edition by federal prime revenue. Its headcount, counted differently in different places, runs from the 1,200 employee-owners it cites to about 1,900 people by one workforce tally. Along the way it has been named ESOP Company of the Year and ranked 72nd on the national Employee Ownership 100. Broad ownership did not keep it small. It grew into a firm that competes for billion-dollar prime work while every eligible employee accrues shares.
The honest note
This series does not airbrush, so the litigation record belongs here, told plainly. It is the ordinary kind for a firm this size, and it is notable mainly for which side Torch is on. Competitors have protested Torch's contract awards to the Government Accountability Office, and in the cases on the public record Torch prevailed as the defending awardee, including a 2018 protest that the office dismissed. That is the normal friction of a competitive market, not a finding of wrongdoing. No debarment, fraud finding, or similar sanction surfaced against the company. The record here is quiet, which for a contractor is its own kind of good news.
The ledger reading
Strip away the acronyms and Torch is the same argument as every other post in this series, carried one step past where the others stop. A business is an asset, and the wealth is in owning it rather than drawing a salary from it. Most of the people in this series acted on that by selling the asset to someone with a bigger balance sheet and keeping a slice of the upside. The founders of Torch acted on it by handing the asset to their own workforce, and then the workforce did something rarer still. It voted to make the ownership permanent, to write it into the charter so that no future offer, however large, could easily pry the company loose from the people who run it.
It is about the cleanest illustration there is of the idea underneath The W-2 Trap: a paycheck is a claim on your hours, and hours do not compound, but a share of the company you help build does. At most firms that share is something a founder or a fund holds. At Torch, the whole staff holds it, and the whole staff voted to keep holding it. In a series full of companies that were built to be bought, Torch is the one that was built, on purpose and by ballot, not to be.
Related reading
- Built to Be Bought: the sell-and-roll playbook this company was structured to resist.
- PeopleTec: The Cleared Contractor That Sold to Its Own Employees: the Huntsville neighbor that made the same choice, one step short of the charter vote.
- Anduril: The Defense Company Built Not to Be Bought: another firm built to stay independent, through venture capital rather than an employee trust.
- Sierra Nevada Corporation: The Family-Owned Prime That Refused to Sell: the same refusal to sell, held by a single family instead of a workforce.
- Government Contract Vehicles, Explained: the standing contracts, like RS3, that a firm this size lives on.
Fact-check notes and sources
- Founded October 2, 2002, in Huntsville by Bill Roark and Don Holder, both veteran defense engineers, with the employee-ownership model rooted in a previous employer's acquisition breaking commitments to staff: the twentieth-anniversary account, Torch's leadership page, and Forbes on the founding motivation. The specific prior employer is not named in the public sources.
- Torch is a wholly owned subsidiary of Starfish Holdings, an S-corporation owned 100 percent by an employee stock ownership plan and trust, which also holds a real-estate and a simulation-training entity: Starfish Holdings. The plan began in 2004 and reached 100 percent employee ownership by the end of 2011: inknowvation. Some records date a related ownership milestone to 2011 and others to 2010; the weight of sourcing points to late 2011.
- The October 2, 2023 vote by roughly 1,200 employee-owners, at a supermajority near 90 percent of shares and people, to convert Torch into a Delaware public benefit corporation, expanding the board's duties beyond shareholders, making it one of the first defense contractors to do so: Torch's announcement and 256today.
- Bill Roark's 2025 Senate testimony on the employee-ownership model: Huntsville Business Journal.
- Nearly 2.9 billion dollars in aviation and missile task orders in a single week of May 2021, and a 195 million dollar Army research-and-development award in January 2026: Huntsville Business Journal and ClearanceJobs.
- Annual revenue past 800 million dollars by 2025, and 57th on Washington Technology's 2024 Top 100 by federal prime revenue: the Senate-testimony coverage and Washington Technology. Headcount reported between about 1,200 and 1,900 depending on the count: Great Place to Work. Ranked 72nd on the 2025 Employee Ownership 100: Torch.
- Torch prevailing as the defending awardee in a 2018 GAO bid protest, with no debarment or fraud finding located: the GAO decision. The protest record is the ordinary competitive kind.
This post is informational and journalistic, describing a publicly reported company, its people, and public records. It is not investment, tax, legal, or M&A advice. All parties are discussed from public records and their own published statements as nominative fair use, with no affiliation implied and nothing endorsed by them.