← Back to Blog

The Firm Behind the Show: Ruthless, Cavalry, and How a Political Podcast's Money Works

The Firm Behind the Show: Ruthless, Cavalry, and How a Political Podcast's Money Works

Most of the fortunes in this series are old, and their structures are public because size eventually forces disclosure. Here is a smaller, newer, and more ordinary case that is useful precisely because it shows where the public record stops. The people behind the conservative podcast Ruthless run two closely held private companies, a political consulting firm and a media entity, and their wealth, to the extent it exists, sits inside those companies. Because one of those companies is paid by political campaigns, campaign-finance law pries open a narrow window most private firms never have. Read carefully, that window shows a lot of money moving and tells you almost nothing about how much anyone keeps. This is a study in what is knowable, handled neutrally and from the record. It takes no political side.

The podcast

Ruthless launched in October 2020, just before that year's presidential election, and brands itself, with a deliberate misspelling, as "a variety progrum" (Axios; Ruthless Podcast). It is widely described as a conservative counterpart to the progressive show Pod Save America, mixing news analysis with comedy and interviews, and it publishes three episodes a week distributed across Apple, Spotify, YouTube, and other platforms (OutKick; Fox News). The only circulating audience figure is a self-reported "average of around 5 million unique listeners," which is not independently audited, so it is best treated as the show's own claim rather than a verified number (Cavalry LLC).

The business model is a familiar podcast mix: merchandise, advertising sold through a marketplace, and ticketed live shows, including one at Washington's Anthem in 2022 and broadcasts from the 2024 Republican National Convention (OutKick). The most significant business event came on July 15, 2025, when Fox News Media announced a licensing deal that placed Ruthless in a new-media division and made the four hosts Fox News contributors. The financial terms were not disclosed (Fox News press release; Axios).

The hosts

The show has four hosts, and three of them are principals of the same firm. Josh Holmes was chief of staff to Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell from 2010 to 2013, then ran McConnell's 2014 reelection campaign, and in 2015 co-founded the Republican consulting firm Cavalry LLC, where he is president (PolitiFact; Roll Call; LegiStorm). Michael Duncan, a digital strategist, and John Ashbrook, a communications specialist whose most recent Capitol Hill role was staff director of the Senate Republican Communications Center, are the other two founding Cavalry partners (Cavalry LLC; LegiStorm). A few widely repeated details do not hold up: this Michael Duncan is not the former Republican National Committee chairman of the same surname, and no journalism role appears in Ashbrook's documented record, which is Senate Republican communications and campaigns throughout.

The fourth host uses the pseudonym "Comfortably Smug," and here the record requires care. Fox News's own July 2025 press release, a primary source distributed by the show's business partner, publicly names him: the program is co-hosted by Holmes, Duncan, and Ashbrook "as well as Shashank Tripathi, pseudonymously known as 'Comfortably Smug'" (Fox News press release). He is described as having a finance background and guards his appearance in public. That same persona was at the center of a documented 2012 episode: during Hurricane Sandy, the @ComfortablySmug account posted false claims, including that the New York Stock Exchange floor had flooded, after which the account holder was identified as Tripathi and resigned as a Republican congressional candidate's campaign manager, and apologized (BuzzFeed News; Poynter). The link between today's host and that 2012 account rests on a continuous persona and the name his own business partner now states officially, not on a personal admission; the host has neither confirmed nor denied it. That is the honest level of certainty, and it is worth stating plainly rather than either asserting or hiding.

The money, and the limits of what it shows

The wealth question here has an unusually bright partial answer and a genuinely dark remainder. Cavalry LLC is a privately held consulting firm that files no public financial statements, so on its own it would be a closed book (Cavalry LLC). But because it is paid by political campaigns and committees, and because those committees must itemize their spending to the Federal Election Commission, the firm's revenue leaves a public trail almost no private business has. Aggregated, the committees paying Cavalry disbursed roughly $36 million in the 2020 cycle, $13 million in 2022, and $12 million in 2024, concentrated among McConnell-aligned committees and the Senate Republican campaign arm (OpenSecrets).

Those numbers look enormous, and this is the single most important thing to understand about them: they are money routed through the firm, not money the firm keeps. The largest individual line items are media buys, digital advertising and list rentals, that the firm places on a campaign's behalf and largely passes through to ad platforms and vendors (FEC records). Because a vendor does not have to disclose what it pays its own subcontractors, the public figure overstates the firm's actual earnings, a well-documented pattern for digital political firms (OpenSecrets). The podcast itself sits in a separate company, Bobcat Media LLC, which has no campaign-finance records at all, meaning its advertising, merchandise, and Fox licensing revenue are entirely private (FEC records).

And the personal question, what any of the four hosts is individually worth, what they invest in, what boards they sit on, has a clean and defensible answer: it is not in the public record. None of them is a federal candidate, officeholder, or senior appointee, so none is required to file a personal financial disclosure, and absent that filing the information simply does not exist publicly. The only documented ventures are the two firms themselves. Where their personal balance sheets are concerned, the correct statement is that they are not publicly documented, and this piece does not estimate them.

How it fits the series

Set against the dynasties elsewhere in this series, the Ruthless team is a useful small case because it shows the default state of private wealth, the state that trusts and holding companies and foundations are all built to preserve. The wealth vehicle here is exactly what those larger families formalize: equity in closely held private companies, plus the cash those companies throw off, opaque by default. A consulting firm and a media company owned by a handful of partners is, structurally, the same kind of object as a private law firm, an advertising agency, or a family media business, its value sitting in the company and its relationships rather than in disclosed securities.

The one twist is the campaign-finance window, and it is worth appreciating exactly what it does and does not reveal. Political-vendor status pierces part of the normal opacity of a private firm, forcing disclosure of who paid, when, and for what stated purpose. That is far more than most private businesses ever reveal. But it stops at the top line. It shows the dollars moving through the door and never the profit, the margins, the ownership splits, or the partners' draws. It is a reminder that even the brightest public window on private money usually illuminates the flow and leaves the fortune itself in shadow, which is precisely why the families who most want to preserve wealth build the structures that keep it there.

Related reading

Fact-check notes and sources

  • The podcast (Ruthless launching in October 2020 and branding itself a "variety progrum," its description as a conservative counterpart to Pod Save America, its three-a-week cadence and multi-platform distribution, the self-reported roughly 5 million unique-listener figure, the business model of merchandise, advertising, and live shows, and the July 15, 2025 Fox News licensing deal that made the hosts Fox contributors on undisclosed terms): Axios, Ruthless Podcast, OutKick, Fox News, Cavalry LLC, and Fox News press release. The exact launch day differs across sources (October 9 versus October 22, 2020), so only "October 2020" is asserted; the listener figure is self-reported and not independently audited.
  • The hosts (Josh Holmes as McConnell's former chief of staff and 2014 campaign leader and a Cavalry founder and president; Michael Duncan and John Ashbrook as the other founding Cavalry partners; and the pseudonymous fourth host): PolitiFact, Roll Call, LegiStorm on Holmes, Cavalry LLC on Ashbrook, and LegiStorm on Ashbrook. Several commonly repeated claims are not supported and are avoided here: this Michael Duncan is not the former RNC chairman of the same surname, no journalism role is documented for Ashbrook, and Holmes's 2014 NRSC role was senior advisor rather than executive director.
  • The pseudonymous host (Fox News's July 2025 press release publicly naming the fourth host as Shashank Tripathi, known as "Comfortably Smug," and the documented 2012 Hurricane Sandy episode tied to that persona): Fox News press release, BuzzFeed News, and Poynter. The name is on the public record via a primary source; the tie between today's host and the 2012 account rests on persona continuity and that official naming, not on a personal admission, and the host has neither confirmed nor denied it.
  • The money (Cavalry LLC as a private consulting firm; the roughly $36 million, $13 million, and $12 million in committee disbursements routed through it in the 2020, 2022, and 2024 cycles; the crucial caveat that these gross totals are largely pass-through media buys rather than firm profit; the separate Bobcat Media LLC producing the podcast with no campaign-finance records; and the absence of any public documentation of the hosts' personal net worth, investments, or board seats): Cavalry LLC, OpenSecrets vendor data, FEC Schedule B records, and OpenSecrets on political ad-buying. The gross FEC totals overstate the firm's earnings because vendors need not disclose payments to their own subcontractors; the personal financial information does not exist in the public record because none of the four is required to file a disclosure.

This post is informational and neutral, not financial or political advocacy. Figures are reproduced from the cited public records, campaign-finance data, and reporting, with self-reported, single-source, and undisclosed items flagged as such. Individuals and companies are discussed as nominative fair use from the public record, with no affiliation implied.

← Back to Blog

Accessibility Options

Text Size
High Contrast
Reduce Motion
Reading Guide
Link Highlighting
Accessibility Statement

J.A. Watte is committed to ensuring digital accessibility for people with disabilities. This site conforms to WCAG 2.1 and 2.2 Level AA guidelines.

Measures Taken

  • Semantic HTML with proper heading hierarchy
  • ARIA labels and roles for interactive components
  • Color contrast ratios meeting WCAG AA (4.5:1)
  • Full keyboard navigation support
  • Skip navigation link
  • Visible focus indicators (3:1 contrast)
  • 44px minimum touch/click targets
  • Dark/light theme with system preference detection
  • Responsive design for all devices
  • Reduced motion support (CSS + toggle)
  • Text size customization (14px–20px)
  • Print stylesheet

Feedback

Contact: jwatte.com/contact

Full Accessibility StatementPrivacy Policy

Last updated: April 2026