# The Common Course: Four Centuries of Collective Experiments, Read from the Ledger

From Plymouth's common storehouse to New Harmony, Debs, the kibbutz, Xiaogang village, and the DSA's New York, the collective experiments left four hundred years of data. The ledger grades them all the same way.

Author: J.A. Watte
Published: July 3, 2026
Source: https://jwatte.com/blog/common-course-collective-experiments-ledger/

---


A note on method before anything else. This series spent fifteen biographies bankrupting capitalists. Robert Morris died in debtors' prison on his own conviction, William Duer in one on his own greed, and the [seven ledger laws](/blog/forgotten-founders-ledger-lessons/) distilled from their generation were applied without mercy to speculators, bankers, and heroes of property. This article applies the identical laws to the other great American economic experiment, the collective one, from Plymouth's common storehouse to the Democratic Socialists of America's New York, with side trips through every major country that ran the idea at scale. Same standard, same sourcing rules, no party cards checked at the door. The ledger doesn't have politics. That's what makes it useful.

This is the hub of the file, and it carries the history: the American experiments in order, the world's versions, what makes ours different, and the pattern clock. The present-day machinery each chapter points at lives in five focused working files, [this week's commons](/blog/this-weeks-commons-heat-water-grid/), [the runway and the ruler](/blog/runway-and-ruler/), [the federal storehouse](/blog/federal-storehouse/), [priced, pooled, or plundered](/blog/priced-pooled-or-plundered/), and [where the ledger balances](/blog/where-the-ledger-balances/), each short enough to finish with coffee. Start here; branch where your week points.

## 1623: The first American dataset

The United States has been running collective economic experiments since before it existed, and the first one left a written lab report. Plymouth Colony's investors required the settlers to farm in common: land, labor, and harvest pooled, output drawn from a common store. Governor William Bradford's own account, preserved in Of Plymouth Plantation, records how it went and why they stopped.

After repeated hungry years, the colony in 1623 abandoned the common course and assigned "to every family a parcel of land," letting them "set corn every man for his own particular." Bradford's verdict on the change: it "made all hands very industrious, so as much more corn was planted than otherwise would have been," with women who had previously pleaded inability now going "willingly into the field." His diagnosis of the failure is the oldest incentive analysis in American letters: the young and able "did repine that they should spend their time and strength to work for other men's wives and children without any recompense," while the strong received no more than the weak, "this was thought injustice." His conclusion swung at the philosophers directly: the experience "may well evince the vanity of that conceit of Plato's" that abolishing property would make a commonwealth flourish, "as if they were wiser than God."

Hold that mechanism, unpriced contribution breeding resentment and underproduction, because this article is going to watch it fire on four continents across four hundred years.

## The founders argued this among themselves

The Revolution contained this argument inside itself, which is why this series keeps colliding with it. Pennsylvania's radical 1776 constitution, the era's most leveling governance experiment, was opposed by [George Clymer](/blog/george-clymer-forgotten-founder/), one of twenty-three delegates who refused to sign it. Philadelphia's wartime price-control committees, enforcing "just prices" amid the collapsing Continental currency, culminated in October 1779 with a militia crowd attacking the barricaded home of [James Wilson](/blog/james-wilson-forgotten-founder/), the Fort Wilson riot, merchants and price-fixers exchanging live fire over the question of who sets the price of flour. And the money men won the institutional argument: the property-and-credit architecture this series has spent six waves documenting, the banks, the funded debt, the Constitution's contract protections, was built by the Fort Wilson side. The divergence of principles Americans argue about in 2026 is not an import. It's a founding-era argument that never adjourned; only the [Continental's 500-to-1 collapse](/blog/michael-hillegas-forgotten-founder/) that fueled the 1779 price panic got resolved.

## The nineteenth-century laboratory

Then the young republic became the world's test bench for voluntary collectivism, and the results form an actual dataset.

Robert Owen bought an entire Indiana town from a departing religious sect in 1825 and founded New Harmony, the flagship secular commune of the age. It adopted a Community of Equality in February 1826; by March 1827 the experiment was, in the standard account's words, "considered a failure." Two years. Owen spent $200,000 of his own fortune. The internal disputes were Bradford's verbatim, refit for the 1820s: quarrels over "inequity in credits between workers and non-workers." His son Robert Dale Owen's post-mortem described "a heterogeneous collection of radicals, enthusiastic devotees to principle, honest latitudinarians, and lazy theorists, with a sprinkling of unprincipled sharpers." The bitter control in the experiment: the town Owen bought had been built by the Harmonists, a German religious commune that in a decade had assembled 20,000 acres, 160 buildings, and factories producing everything from cloth to whiskey, then sold at a profit and moved on. Communal economics with binding covenant discipline built the town; communal economics on secular enthusiasm couldn't run it for twenty-four months.

The 1840s Fourierist boom planted some thirty phalanx communities on the same model and they evaporated nearly as fast. And the two great survivors of the commune century prove the series' sixth law in the strangest way possible: they lasted by becoming corporations. The Oneida Community (founded 1848) ran a genuinely successful communal economy in animal traps and, from 1877, silverware, until its social system collapsed and its founder fled to Canada; in 1881 it converted itself into a joint-stock company, which became Oneida Limited, one of the largest silverware makers in the world. The Amana Colonies in Iowa held a communal economy together for seventy-seven years on religious covenant, then hit the Depression with fire-damaged mills and members "seeking more personal freedom," and in 1932's Great Change split into a nonprofit church and a for-profit joint-stock Amana Society; two years later a member started the appliance business that carried the name into every American kitchen. Sentiment ran out; structure survived; the structure was a share registry. [Stephen Girard's will](https://thew2trap.com/blog/stephen-girard-will-that-still-works/) would have understood immediately.

## Debs's peak and the custodian exception

The movement's political form ran the same arc at national scale, with numbers. The Socialist Party of America, founded in 1901, grew from 4,320 members to a peak of 113,371 in 1912, the year Eugene Debs took 901,551 votes, six percent, for president; by 1918 the party had won some 1,200 offices including more than 100 mayors. Then the environment turned: the party's opposition to the First World War brought mail suppression and Sedition Act prosecutions (Debs got ten years, and famously polled 913,693 votes from his cell in 1920), and the 1919 communist split tore membership from 77,000 to fewer than 14,000. The organization limped six more decades and dissolved in 1972; one successor fragment, Michael Harrington's DSOC, became today's DSA. Rise on sentiment, break on shock and schism: readers of this series have seen the shape before, in [every crowded trade it has covered](/blog/founders-ledgers-modern-headlines/#duer-ftx).

But the American socialist record contains one spectacular exception, and it proves the seventh law so cleanly it could have been staged. Milwaukee elected socialist mayors for the better part of five decades: Emil Seidel (1910), the first socialist mayor of a major American city, who in two years established the city's first public works department, its first fire and police commission, and a city park system; Daniel Hoan, twenty-four consecutive years (1916 to 1940); Frank Zeidler (1948 to 1960). They governed on sanitation, parks, public health, and famously honest books; a progressive editor's tribute called the Milwaukee socialists "incorruptible." Their own party's left despised them for it: the term "sewer socialism" was coined as an insult at the 1932 national convention, mocking men who bragged about sewer systems instead of revolutions. Read that through this series and the insult inverts: the only socialists in American history who held durable executive power did it by being custodians, boring, solvent, incremental, exactly the temperament that [Hillegas, Meredith, Wolcott, and Gallatin](/blog/albert-gallatin-forgotten-founder/) brought to the other side's institutions. The ledger pays the custodian premium regardless of ideology.

## The world ran the big versions

The American experiments were small and voluntary. The twentieth century ran the involuntary versions at nation scale, and the data is the darkest in this series.

Revolutionary Russia's War Communism administered the economy by decree, requisitioning grain and abolishing markets; the standard account records that "producers who were not directly compensated for their labor often stopped working," Petrograd lost 850,000 people, famine killed millions in 1921 and 1922, and sailors who had made the revolution rose against it at Kronstadt. What happened next is the most underrated event in the history of this argument: Lenin retreated. The 1921 New Economic Policy replaced requisition with a tax and let peasants sell their surplus, and its author called the program "state capitalism," a "step backwards" taken in order to "take two steps forward later on." Agriculture rebounded roughly forty percent from the famine floor, reaching prewar levels by 1928, at which point Stalin abolished the retreat and collectivized by force, with consequences that belong to the history of atrocity as much as economics.

China ran both halves of the experiment in a single generation. The Great Leap Forward's people's communes forbade individual plots, set quotas from above, melted farm tools into useless backyard steel, and produced the deadliest famine in recorded history; the scholarly estimates concentrate, in the consolidated account's words, "around 30 to 46 million excess famine deaths," with a full range from 15 to 55 million depending on the researcher. And then, in late 1978, in Xiaogang village in Anhui, eighteen farmers met in secret and signed a contract dividing the commune's land into household plots, each family keeping what it grew beyond quota, an act dangerous enough that they made provisions for each other's children if the signers were jailed. One of the eighteen, Yen Jingchang, later described the result in a sentence Bradford could have written at Plymouth: "We all secretly competed, everyone wanted to produce more than the next person." Output jumped, local officials noticed, and instead of prison the farmers got policy: the household responsibility system spread to ten percent of production teams by 1979, half the southeast by 1981, official blessing in the Central Committee's 1982 No. 1 document, and "total victory" by 1983, ending the commune system. The most consequential economic reform of the twentieth century was Plymouth's 1623 reform, rediscovered under penalty of death, 355 years later, by farmers who had never heard of William Bradford.

Two more national cases complete the picture, because honesty requires the successes. Israel's kibbutzim are the strongest positive result voluntary collectivism has ever produced: some 270 communities that at their height ran 9 percent of Israel's industrial output and 40 percent of its agriculture on fully communal principles, an achievement no American commune approached. And when the 1980s debt crisis hit them, they did what Oneida and Amana did, they restructured rather than dissolved: by the early 2010s, 188 of 262 kibbutzim, about 72 percent, had adopted the "renewing" model with differential salaries, keeping the community and repricing the labor. Bradford's mechanism, answered with an amendment instead of a funeral. And Denmark, the case most often cited in American debates as socialism's success story, was characterized by its own prime minister at Harvard with a clarity worth quoting exactly: "Denmark is far from a socialist planned economy. Denmark is a market economy," one with "an expanded welfare state," which is to say: the famous positive outcome is a ledger-respecting market system carrying a large, priced, taxed redistribution on top. That's not a gotcha in either direction. It's the data point.

## What makes the American record different

Line the cases up and the American difference isn't virtue; it's architecture, the same property-credit-and-exit architecture this series watched [Morris, Willing, and Hamilton's generation build](/blog/thomas-willing-forgotten-founder/). American collective experiments were small, voluntary, and embedded in a system that priced their failures locally. New Harmony's collapse cost Robert Owen $200,000 and cost Indiana nothing; the town simply became a science center. Failure was cheap, exit was legal, and adaptation had somewhere to go: a commune that outgrew its sentiment could file as a corporation by Tuesday. The coercive national versions had none of that. No exit, no price signals, no small-scale trial, no legal form to retreat into, so their failures were famines, and their reforms, when they finally came, were Plymouth's reform at gunpoint remove: Lenin's NEP and Deng's household responsibility system are both, structurally, Bradford's 1623 allotment. And when the United States faced the largest commons any government ever held, the public domain itself, it mostly declined to run a storehouse at all. The Homestead Acts priced the commons in labor: 160 acres of surveyed public land for five years of residence and cultivation plus a $10 filing fee and an $8 patent fee, or commutation at $1.25 an acre. Between 1862 and 1934 about 1.6 million homesteaders proved up roughly 270 million acres, a tenth of all the land in the country, and the price was real, only about 40 percent of applicants completed the claim. As of 2017, an estimated 93 million Americans descend from someone who did. The hero image atop this article, a common field resolving into small tended plots, each with its own lantern, is that policy rendered as landscape. Where the government instead kept its land commons unpriced, in grazing allotments and floodplains, the storehouse pattern of this article returned on schedule.

The United States never learned this lesson better than anyone. It just built a system where the tuition was affordable, which, four hundred years into the file, may be the single most underrated feature of the founders' ledger.

## The present tense

Which brings the file to the present tense, because the DSA's trajectory and this week's news are both in it.

The organization's own membership series is a sentiment seismograph: roughly 6,000 members from the 1982 founding through 2016, then 24,000 by July 2017, 55,000 by 2018, a peak around 94,000 in 2021, down to 64,000 by October 2024, back over 80,000 in October 2025 and past 100,000 by February 2026, with more than 250 members in office and Zohran Mamdani's election as mayor of New York, in the consolidated account's words, "the biggest electoral victory in DSA history." Spikes on events, troughs on drift: the SPA's curve, rerun at internet speed, currently on an upswing with actual executive power attached. Which historical branch it takes, New Harmony's, the SPA's, or Milwaukee's, is precisely the open question, and the sewer socialists' file says the answer will be written in budgets, not manifestos.

That present tense is running measurable experiments as this publishes: a 78-degree thermostat request beside a bright arena, western towns rationing incumbents while permitting growth, a grid mandate upheld ahead of the grid. Those live in [this week's commons](/blog/this-weeks-commons-heat-water-grid/), documented to this series' sourcing standard, and the question they all reduce to is the one this hub has been building: whether the commons in question carries a price, a gate, or only a request.

## The clock pattern

Line the repricings up on a timeline and the file yields one more correlation, the one that explains why the same story keeps arriving at different speeds. Every commons in this article eventually strained. What varied was how long it took the people inside it to reprice, and that interval tracks one variable: how much exit and voice they had. Plymouth, tiny and self-governing, repriced in three years; Bradford's colonists could argue at meeting and see the whole ledger. The kibbutzim, voluntary and democratic, took roughly a decade of debt crisis to adopt differential salaries, and survived. China's farmers had neither exit nor voice, and the repricing took twenty years, a famine measured in tens of millions, and a change of leadership before eighteen men in a village could do in secret what Plymouth did at a town meeting. The Soviet Union repriced once, in 1921, when rebellion forced Lenin's hand, and then re-coerced in 1928 because nothing structural bound the retreat, which is why its famine came after its NEP instead of before. The American national commons, Social Security's runway, [the flood program's eighteenth rebuild](/blog/federal-storehouse/), [the dedication standards shrinking under Douglas County's growth](/blog/this-weeks-commons-heat-water-grid/), strains in slow motion precisely because its members have voice without much exit: you can vote about the storehouse, but you can't easily leave it, so the repricing queues up behind elections instead of behind hunger. Read the news through that clock and the question for any straining commons stops being whether it gets repriced and becomes who is allowed to notice first, and at what cost. The colonists noticed in a winter. The eighteen farmers noticed under penalty of prison. A voter can notice for the price of reading a trustees' report, which is the cheapest that noticing has ever been, and the discount is the most underused thing in American civic life.

## The file at a glance

Fourteen experiments, one line each, every entry sourced in its section above or in the linked working files:

- **Plymouth's common course (1620-1623)**: investor-mandated pooling; hunger and resentment; reformed to household plots; "made all hands very industrious."
- **The Harmonists (1814-1824)**: communal economy under religious covenant; built 20,000 acres and factories; sold at a profit and moved on, solvent.
- **New Harmony (1825-1827)**: secular commune, no binding structure; failed in about two years; cost Owen $200,000.
- **The Fourierist phalanxes (1840s)**: some thirty attempts on borrowed enthusiasm; a brief boom, then gone.
- **Oneida (1848-1881)**: covenant commune with real industries; converted to a joint-stock company; the silverware outlived the theology.
- **Amana (1855-1932)**: seventy-seven communal years on covenant; the Great Change split church from business; the corporation carried the name forward.
- **The Socialist Party of America (1901-1972)**: sentiment-driven rise to 113,371 members and 1,200 offices; broken by war, suppression, and the 1919 schism.
- **Milwaukee's sewer socialists (1910-1960)**: socialism run as custodianship; parks, sanitation, honest books; the movement's only durable American governance.
- **War Communism and the NEP (1918-1928)**: coercion, collapse, famine; Lenin's priced retreat recovered output to 1913 levels; Stalin abolished the retreat.
- **The people's communes (1958-1983)**: the deadliest famine in recorded history; ended when eighteen Xiaogang farmers re-ran Plymouth's reform in secret.
- **The kibbutzim (twentieth century to present)**: voluntary collectivism's best result; hit the 1980s debt crisis; 72 percent repriced labor and survived.
- **The DSA (1982-present)**: sentiment seismograph from 6,000 members to past 100,000; now holding real executive power; branch undetermined, ledger waiting.
- **Australia's water markets (Murray-Darling, ongoing)**: the commons priced; allocations trade in dry years, and the national argument has upgraded from rationing to referee integrity.
- **Thames Water (2006-present)**: the commons extracted; debt from £4.14 billion to £10.5 billion under one ownership while £2.8 billion in dividends left, now roughly £20 billion in debt with rescues failing.

## What the four-hundred-year file says

The trajectory the record supports, stated plainly. Common-pool production without priced contribution fails fast, three winters at Plymouth, two years at New Harmony, and its failure mode is always the same documented resentment. Durability comes from binding structure, religious covenant bought the Harmonists and Amana decades, and the long-run survivors converted into corporations or, in the kibbutz case, into salary-differentiated hybrids. Political movements built on the idea rise on sentiment spikes and break on shock and schism, unless they govern as custodians, in which case they can hold power for decades and get insulted by their own comrades for competence. The national coercive versions produced the largest man-made catastrophes in history, and their own architects retreated toward Plymouth's solution whenever survival required it. Positive outcomes exist and are real: Milwaukee's governance, the kibbutz economy and its adaptive reform, the commune-descended corporations, the welfare-states-on-market-chassis that their own prime ministers insist are market economies. Every positive case has the same signature: the sentiment got a structure, the contribution got a price, and the ledger got respected.

That is the familiar, already-known trajectory. Not that collective aspiration always ends in ruin, the file is more interesting than that, but that it ends where every story in this series ends, at the same seven laws that ruined Morris and enriched Bingham, graded without regard to what anyone believed. The experiment currently running in New York will be graded the same way. So will yours.

## The working files

The file's present-day machinery, split into five short companions, each self-contained and cited:

- [This Week's Commons: Heat, Water, and the Grid](/blog/this-weeks-commons-heat-water-grid/): the 78-degree ask and the arena, the permit-and-restrict West, and mandates ahead of megawatts, July 2026.
- [The Runway and the Ruler](/blog/runway-and-ruler/): Social Security's published runway, a maximum earner's worked example, the CPI's rebuilt ruler, and the insurance float that ends in Bermuda.
- [The Federal Storehouse](/blog/federal-storehouse/): three donor states, the $1.32 average draw, the proximity premium, the trust accounts, and fire, flood, and FEMA dollars.
- [Priced, Pooled, or Plundered](/blog/priced-pooled-or-plundered/): Australia's water markets, Thames Water's extraction, and the five-question household playbook.
- [Where the Ledger Balances](/blog/where-the-ledger-balances/): the states running the opposite structure, and the honest map of exemplary budgets, schools, water, and premiums.

## Related reading

- [The Ledger Lessons: 15 Founding Fortunes and What They Teach About Money in 2026](/blog/forgotten-founders-ledger-lessons/): the seven laws this article applies.
- [1792 Is Trending: The Modern Headlines Hiding in the Founders' Ledgers](/blog/founders-ledgers-modern-headlines/): the crosswalk method, applied to markets.
- [James Wilson Drafted the Constitution and Died Hiding From His Creditors](/blog/james-wilson-forgotten-founder/): the Fort Wilson riot, from the man inside the house.
- [George Clymer: The Founder Who Took the Jobs Nobody Wanted](/blog/george-clymer-forgotten-founder/): the 1776 Pennsylvania constitution fight, from a refuser.

## Fact-check notes and sources

- **Plymouth (the 1623 allotment "to every family a parcel of land," "set corn every man for his own particular," "made all hands very industrious," the "vanity of that conceit of Plato's" and "as if they were wiser than God" passages, the repining of the young men, women going "willingly into the field")**: William Bradford, Of Plymouth Plantation (Morison edition), as reproduced by [the University of Chicago Press's Founders' Constitution](https://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/v1ch16s1.html).
- **The founders' internal fight (Pennsylvania's 1776 constitution and Clymer's refusal; the October 1779 Fort Wilson riot amid price-control committees)**: sourced in [the Clymer](/blog/george-clymer-forgotten-founder/) and [Wilson](/blog/james-wilson-forgotten-founder/) series posts via DSDI.
- **New Harmony (January 1825 purchase, 700-800 residents, the February 1826 Community of Equality, "by March 1827... considered a failure," Owen's $200,000, the credits dispute, Robert Dale Owen's quoted description, the Harmonists' 20,000 acres and 160 buildings, the town's scientific afterlife)**: [Wikipedia, "New Harmony, Indiana"](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Harmony,_Indiana), attributed as the consolidated account.
- **The Fourierist boom ("some 30 Fourierist associations")**: [Wikipedia, "Fourierism"](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourierism), attributed; that article gives no lifespan statistics and none are claimed here.
- **Oneida (1848 founding, ~87 to ~306 members, silverware from 1877, Noyes's 1879 flight to Canada, the 1881 conversion to a joint-stock company that became Oneida Limited)**: [Wikipedia, "Oneida Community"](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oneida_Community), attributed.
- **Amana (1855 settlement, roughly 77 communal years, the March 1931 financial disclosure, mill fires, members "seeking more personal freedom," the 1932 Great Change split into church society and joint-stock corporation, Foerstner's 1934 $3,500 start of what became Amana Refrigeration)**: [Wikipedia, "Amana Colonies"](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amana_Colonies), attributed.
- **Socialist Party of America (founded July 29, 1901; membership series 4,320 to the 113,371 peak of 1912; Debs's 901,551 votes and 6 percent in 1912 and 913,693 from prison in 1920; roughly 1,200 offices and 100-plus mayors; wartime suppression and the Sedition Act; the 1919 split collapsing membership from 77,000 to fewer than 14,000; dissolution December 30, 1972 and the DSOC successor)**: [Wikipedia, "Socialist Party of America"](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialist_Party_of_America), attributed.
- **Sewer socialists (Seidel 1910, Hoan 1916-1940, Zeidler 1948-1960, the 1932 origin of the term as Morris Hillquit's insult, the "incorruptible" tribute, the sanitation-parks-honest-budgets record)**: [Wikipedia, "Sewer socialism"](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sewer_socialism), attributed.
- **War Communism and the NEP (administration by decree, "producers who were not directly compensated for their labor often stopped working," Petrograd's 850,000-person decline, the 1921-22 famine, Kronstadt, the 1921 tax in kind, Lenin's "state capitalism" and "step backwards... two steps forward" characterizations, the roughly 40 percent agricultural rebound and 1928 recovery to 1913 levels, Stalin's 1928 abolition)**: [Wikipedia, "New Economic Policy"](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Economic_Policy), attributed.
- **The Great Chinese Famine (communes forbidding individual plots, quota appropriation, the steel diversion and sparrow campaign, and the death-toll scholarship "concentrated around 30 to 46 million excess famine deaths" within a published 15-to-55-million range)**: [Wikipedia, "Great Chinese Famine"](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Chinese_Famine), attributed with the estimates' named researchers preserved there.
- **Xiaogang and the household responsibility system (the eighteen farmers' secret 1978 contract, Yen Jingchang's "We all secretly competed" quotation, the 1979-1983 rollout percentages, the 1982 No. 1 document, the end of the communes)**: [Wikipedia, "Household responsibility system"](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Household_responsibility_system), attributed.
- **Kibbutzim (roughly 270 communities and 126,000 residents circa 2010, 9 percent of industrial output worth $8 billion and 40 percent of agriculture worth $1.7 billion, the 1980s crisis, and 188 of 262 kibbutzim, about 72 percent, on the differential-salary renewing model by the early 2010s)**: [Wikipedia, "Kibbutz"](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kibbutz), attributed.
- **Denmark ("Denmark is far from a socialist planned economy. Denmark is a market economy," and the "expanded welfare state" framing, Lars Løkke Rasmussen at Harvard's Kennedy School, 2015)**: [The Local Denmark, November 1, 2015](https://www.thelocal.dk/20151101/danish-pm-in-us-denmark-is-not-socialist).
- **DSA (the 1982 Harrington merger, the membership series from roughly 6,000 through 24,000 in July 2017, 55,000 in 2018, the circa-94,000 peak of 2021, 64,000 in October 2024, over 80,000 in October 2025 and past 100,000 by February 2026, the 250-plus officeholders as of August 2025, and Mamdani's 2025 election described as "the biggest electoral victory in DSA history")**: [Wikipedia, "Democratic Socialists of America"](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Socialists_of_America), attributed.
- **The Homestead Acts (160 acres for five years' residence and cultivation, the $10 filing and $8 patent fees, commutation at $1.25 per acre, 1.6 million homesteaders and roughly 270 million acres, about 10 percent of U.S. land, between 1862 and 1934, the roughly 40 percent completion rate, Alaska's program running to 1986, and the estimated 93 million descendants as of 2017)**: [Wikipedia, "Homestead Acts"](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homestead_Acts), attributed.

*This post is informational and historical, not political advocacy or financial advice. Figures are reproduced from the cited sources; characterizations of living officials describe documented public actions without judgment of motive; institutions, publications, and public figures are mentioned as nominative fair use with no affiliation implied.*


---

Canonical HTML: https://jwatte.com/blog/common-course-collective-experiments-ledger/
RSS: https://jwatte.com/feed.xml
JSON Feed: https://jwatte.com/feed.json
Hero image: https://jwatte.com/images/common-course-collective-experiments-ledger.webp